Posted on May 25, 2018
The Wall Street Journal recently reported that Amazon.com Inc. has made about 200 phone calls to cities which failed to make the cut for consideration as a location for the company’s second headquarters. Some of the cities say they are "learning from the disappointing phone conversations and making changes." For example, Detroit is now considering strengthening its regional transportation network after Amazon officials told them it was the main reason the city did not make the HQ2 short list. The city did not have enough tech workers to fill 50,000 jobs and had no way, other than cars, of bringing people from outside the city limits to work at the proposed site. Additionally, Cincinnati, Ohio, and Sacramento, California, are restructuring workforce development programs to focus on tech talent. Orlando, Florida, is considering starting a community fund to invest in local tech companies and draw more entrepreneurs.
Traditionally when bargaining with big companies, according to the article, the site selection process is negotiated without fanfare, among a company, their consultants and local government. The "highly visible" Amazon process is forcing cities to explain why they did not reach the second round and address those weaknesses. "It is a kind of look-in-the-mirror moment," said Joseph Parilla of the Brookings Institution. Other experts warn cities should not operate at the behest of large companies and should instead establish their own priorities.